It sounds weird but it is possible. The production is always the secret of the business. We need to keep secret every move we make in order to produce our products.
In the Social Business this is not possible, to keep away the secrets from the social contributors. What we can make is an extra fee for the participation in this procedure. So if someone wants to know the resources of the production and be able to decide for them, the quality, the production stages and the outsourcing cooperations, should be able to contribute some more than money. He should contribute his knowledge and his PR.
But how it works in order to have the final product ready to sell? All the production stages should be clear and easy to define from the design department and the supplies department. After these specifications the department should search for outsourcing contributors. Yes we need the outsourcers as contributors. So in this way the outsourcers should have the interested to join as contributors. By this way they promote their job and their product or services through the social business.
The idea is to attract in each social business department, contributors who need of self promotion and public validation. A positive recommendation from the social contributors might be one of the best prizes for the contributors.
So we need to have outsourcers for all the stages of the production in order to contribute in the production of our product. But who is organizing this? The contributors are able to take decisions correct and fast?
I think not, the platform of the social business comes once again to the top. This software platform comes to create a way of social decision for the important decisions of the production and give the authority to a managing team of the department to take the general directions and negotiate with the outsourcing contributors for the final production procedure.
This sounds angelic, but you might see some problems in the horizon which i agree with you. These problems are first of all the time consuming procedure in order for the contributors to suggest their ideas and discuss the next step. Also when we have arguments how we can resolve them?
These problems seem to be realistic valued, but with the election of a production team management, these problems seem to be less problematic.
I see myself a problem in the production line of a social business, but i believe that the procedure of contribution is able to override these problems and finally bring an innovative product which was produced by an innovative social business. The only thing that is left is to give a shot on this!
In the Social Business this is not possible, to keep away the secrets from the social contributors. What we can make is an extra fee for the participation in this procedure. So if someone wants to know the resources of the production and be able to decide for them, the quality, the production stages and the outsourcing cooperations, should be able to contribute some more than money. He should contribute his knowledge and his PR.
But how it works in order to have the final product ready to sell? All the production stages should be clear and easy to define from the design department and the supplies department. After these specifications the department should search for outsourcing contributors. Yes we need the outsourcers as contributors. So in this way the outsourcers should have the interested to join as contributors. By this way they promote their job and their product or services through the social business.
The idea is to attract in each social business department, contributors who need of self promotion and public validation. A positive recommendation from the social contributors might be one of the best prizes for the contributors.
So we need to have outsourcers for all the stages of the production in order to contribute in the production of our product. But who is organizing this? The contributors are able to take decisions correct and fast?
I think not, the platform of the social business comes once again to the top. This software platform comes to create a way of social decision for the important decisions of the production and give the authority to a managing team of the department to take the general directions and negotiate with the outsourcing contributors for the final production procedure.
This sounds angelic, but you might see some problems in the horizon which i agree with you. These problems are first of all the time consuming procedure in order for the contributors to suggest their ideas and discuss the next step. Also when we have arguments how we can resolve them?
These problems seem to be realistic valued, but with the election of a production team management, these problems seem to be less problematic.
I see myself a problem in the production line of a social business, but i believe that the procedure of contribution is able to override these problems and finally bring an innovative product which was produced by an innovative social business. The only thing that is left is to give a shot on this!
No comments:
Post a Comment